Skip to content
All posts

Why PE Firms Should Assess Their Own Teams for Successful Acquisitions

In today's competitive business environment, private equity (PE) firms are constantly seeking innovative ways to optimize their investment decisions and improve the performance of their portfolio companies. One key factor in this equation is the human element – the teams that execute deals and oversee the management of acquired businesses. In this regard, psychometric assessments have emerged as a valuable tool for PE firms to evaluate their teams and optimize the acquisition process. This blog will explore why it is essential for PE firms to perform psychometrics on their own people and how this data can be used to enhance acquisition success.

  1. Identifying the Right Talent for Acquisition Success

A successful acquisition depends heavily on the team responsible for identifying, evaluating, and managing the target company. By using psychometric assessments, PE firms can identify the strengths and weaknesses of their team members and allocate the right talent to each acquisition process (1). This approach ensures that the firm capitalizes on its internal resources and increases the likelihood of a successful acquisition outcome.

  1. Enhancing Team Dynamics for Improved Performance

Psychometric data can also provide insights into team dynamics, helping PE firms to build and maintain high-performing teams. By understanding individual strengths, weaknesses, and communication styles, firms can create complementary teams that work together effectively to achieve their goals (2). This is crucial in the context of acquisitions, where collaboration and decision-making under tight deadlines are vital.

  1. Reducing Bias in the Acquisition Process

The acquisition process can be influenced by various cognitive biases, which can negatively impact the decision-making process. By using psychometric assessments, PE firms can identify potential biases within their teams and address them proactively (3). This leads to more objective evaluations of potential acquisitions and, ultimately, better investment decisions.

  1. Evaluating Cultural Fit in Acquired Companies

The success of an acquisition is heavily influenced by the cultural compatibility of the acquirer and the target company. Psychometric data can provide insights into the values, motivations, and behaviors of the PE firm's team members, which can be used to assess cultural fit during the acquisition process (4). This ensures a smoother integration of the acquired company, leading to better performance and growth prospects.

  1. Continual Development and Adaptation

By regularly assessing their teams through psychometrics, PE firms can foster a culture of continual development and adaptation. This approach enables firms to keep up with the rapidly changing business landscape, ensuring that their teams are prepared to face new challenges and opportunities in the acquisition process (5).


In conclusion, the application of psychometric assessments within private equity firms offers numerous benefits, including improved team performance, better decision-making, and enhanced cultural fit in acquired companies. By harnessing the power of psychometrics, PE firms can unlock the full potential of their teams and drive more successful acquisition outcomes.


(1) Furnham, A., & Crump, J. (2015). The edge in selecting private equity personnel: The predictive validity of assessment centres. Journal of Business Research, 68(5), 1082-1088.

(2) Halfhill, T., Sundstrom, E., Lahner, J., Calderone, W., & Nielsen, T. M. (2005). Group personality composition and performance in military service teams. Military Psychology, 17(1), 41-54.

(3) Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

(4) Weber, Y., Tarba, S. Y., & Reichel, A. (2011). A model of the influence of culture on integration approaches and international mergers and acquisitions performance. International Business Review, 20(2), 163-174.

(5) Kets de Vries, M. F. R., & Balazs, K. (1997). The downside of downsizing. Human Relations, 50(1), 11-50.