Skip to content
All posts

Pull vs Push Styles: Navigating PE Portfolio Company Leadership

Leadership styles play a crucial role in the success of private equity (PE) portfolio companies. Two popular leadership styles, pull and push, can significantly impact the performance, culture, and future of these organizations. Understanding which leadership style is being used by a portfolio company's management team can enable investors to make informed decisions about their investments. This blog post will delve into the differences between pull and push leadership styles, and discuss the importance of recognizing the style being employed by a portfolio company's leadership team.

Pull Leadership Style

Pull leadership is characterized by the leader's ability to inspire, motivate, and empower their team members to achieve their goals. This style focuses on creating a supportive environment where employees feel valued and are encouraged to take initiative, innovate, and contribute to the organization's success (1). A pull leader often exhibits qualities such as empathy, active listening, and adaptability, and emphasizes collaboration, trust, and open communication (2). This leadership style can be particularly effective in fostering creativity, loyalty, and high levels of employee engagement (3).

Push Leadership Style

In contrast, the push leadership style involves directing and controlling employees to achieve specific goals or tasks. Push leaders tend to set strict expectations, closely monitor performance, and frequently provide feedback or criticism (4). This style is more authoritative and can create a hierarchical structure within the organization. While push leadership can be effective in driving results and meeting short-term goals, it may also lead to decreased employee morale, higher turnover rates, and reduced innovation (5).

Importance of Identifying Leadership Styles in Private Equity Portfolio Companies

Recognizing the leadership style employed by a portfolio company's management team is critical for several reasons:

  1. Investment Decisions: Understanding the leadership style can help investors make informed decisions about their investments, as it can impact the company's culture, productivity, and overall performance.

  2. Organizational Growth: By identifying the leadership style, investors can determine if the current management team is fostering an environment that promotes creativity, innovation, and long-term growth, or if the focus is primarily on achieving short-term objectives.

  3. Employee Retention: A well-suited leadership style can contribute to increased employee satisfaction, loyalty, and retention, ultimately leading to lower turnover costs and better overall performance.

  4. Effective Interventions: Investors can use their understanding of a portfolio company's leadership style to provide targeted guidance and support, helping the organization to adapt and overcome potential challenges.

  5. Potential Red Flags: Recognizing an inappropriate or unsustainable leadership style can serve as an early warning sign, prompting further investigation and possible intervention.


Understanding the difference between pull and push leadership styles, and recognizing which is being used by the leadership team of a private equity portfolio company, is crucial for investors. Being aware of the leadership style can inform investment decisions, promote organizational growth, and contribute to better employee retention. Ultimately, identifying and supporting effective leadership within portfolio companies can help to maximize returns and drive long-term success.


  1. Goleman, D. (2000). Leadership That Gets Results. Harvard Business Review.

  2. Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and Practice. 8th Edition. SAGE Publications.

  3. Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational Leadership. Psychology Press.

  4. Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1969). Life Cycle Theory of Leadership. Training & Development Journal.

  5. Latham, G. P., & Locke, E. A. (1991). Self-Regulation through